Theresa May - or may not: The power of suggestion

MacedoniaOnline: British Bullsh*t on Skripal tied to their upcoming false flag in Syria


Theresa May - or may not ...
​
​The awesome power of suggestion.

Never have so many been so "almost" certain that Russia is "probably" to blame for [insert the latest].

​Is this yet another distraction while a false flag is planned for Idlib, Syria?

BBC: Russian spy poisoning: What we know so far [all emphasis mine]

• The Novichok poisoning of a former Russian double agent and his daughter on British soil was "almost certainly" approved by the Russian government, Prime Minister Theresa May has said.

Well, if the PM of the UK said it, it must be true, eh?  It's a fact that she's "almost" certain!

BBC: Sajid Javid: warning to Russian spy poisoning suspects

• The two suspects in the Salisbury nerve agent attack will be caught and prosecuted if they ever step out of Russia, the home secretary has warned.
• Sajid Javid, however, did acknowledge "the reality is we will probably never see them in the UK".

"Reality" is fact and "probably" is iffy at best -- at least one hopes to heck it is because if we saw them here we'd be hallucinating.

Who is Javid trying to bamboozle? Oh, that's right - the whole world.

Lucky Mr. Javid - he's allowed to happily dissemble to his leader's heart's content on the British taxpayer's £.

• The suspects are understood to have travelled to the UK from Moscow [he says] on 2 March on Russian passports, under the aliases Alexander Petrov and Ruslan Boshirov.

Question: Why would they use Russian passports and Russian-sounding names if they wanted to hide their purpose?  I mean, there's almost the whole word "Russian" in that second guy's moniker.

What a shame that Javid can't say: "they travelled and we can prove it".

• He told the BBC the pair, thought to be from Russia's military intelligence service, the GRU, were acting on orders from the "highest level" in Moscow.
• Mr Javid said the GRU operated on a "very short leash from the Kremlin".
• He described it as a "very well-disciplined organisation" which would "only act with orders from the highest level of the Russian government".

Which "would only act" or which did act?  Lately it seems that a talent for weasle words is the main requirement for the job of representing the people.

• "We will bring all those powers, both overt and covert, to bear on Russia and what it represents today."

Now that's expert innuendo. What does Russia represent today? Whatever we're told it does, apparently.

TruePublica has an excellent analysis from Craig Murray. Some highlights: (all emphasis mine)

• [The two men in the photos] appear to have traveled to Salisbury at the right time to have been involved.

But:

• At 09.15 on Sunday 4 March the Skripals’ car was seen on CCTV driving through three different locations in Salisbury.
• But the Metropolitan Police state that Boshirov and Petrov did not arrive in Salisbury until 11.48 on the day of the poisoning.
• So even if the Skripals made an “invisible” trip home before being seen on Devizes Road, that means the very latest they could have touched the doorknob is 13.15.
• “Boshirov and Petrov” plainly are of interest in this case. But only Theresa May stated they were Russian agents: the police did not, and stated that they expected those were not their real identities.
• If “Boshirov and Petrov” are secret agents, their incompetence is astounding. They used public transport rather than a vehicle and left the clearest possible CCTV footprint.

Also from Craig Murray: Separate CCTV photos with time stamps exactly the same for both men - to the very second!

Notice also that the BBC CCTV photos now show no time stamps at all.  But they nevertheless take the trouble to explain that Heathrow has identical corridors, so the men could have come through at the same time.

But at exactly the same time? To the second?  Am I asking too many questions?

Along with everything else Russia is blamed for, this whole wild story is now added to the manure pile!  If you think the timing of the BBC's explanation is strange, that's because the "Russian machine" has gone to great lengths to make you doubt the official story!

Meanwhile, the BBC sinks to great depths to make you believe it:

BBC:

• "What is really striking is that you no longer see the Russian machine pushing a single message, it pushes dozens of messages," said Ben Nimmo, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council who studies Russian disinformation. "The idea is to confuse people."

The guy's a "senior fellow" so he must be telling the truth, right?

It appears the UK is aiming to do a better job than Russia of confusing people. Why, I, myself, a "senior gal", could be one of those evil mind benders working for Russia. Last night, just before I finally fell asleep, I heard Putin's voice whisper: "The cheque is in the mail."

Image: Psychic Nikki Haley: There will be a Chemical Weapons Attack in Syria, and Assad Did It