susan riley has her eye on your rump

Susan Riley has her eye on your rump.

Protesters take note --

"Time to stop rewarding the refuseniks", she rails. "Call their bluff", she commands.

Time to stop "catering to an unhinged rump!" she diagnoses.

"Stop cowering in the face of anti-vaxxers", she orders.

Skeptics are just "bad-tempered", she sneers.

Lordy, who's the bad-tempered one? Who's frothing at the mouth over people daring to protect democracy and their right to choose what happens to their own bodies -- and to their own offspring.

Hey, I can diagnose too. At worst, Riley shows all the earmarks of a coward who resents the courage of others -- at best she's an opportunist. She gets paid for this, and the Hilltimes expects you to help foot the bill or it won't show you the rest of her tirade. Okay by me; I've seen more than enough:

Hilltimes: Political response to anti-vaxxers too slow, too deferential

• It is time all political leaders acknowledge the sensible, significant majority of Canadians who did the responsible—and, frankly, easy—thing and got their shots.

The author's name is quite apt, given the circumstances -- Riley (as in riles easily). She's riled up about people who have the courage to stand up to creeping fascism. It appears as if she might have praised Hitler's actions too.

To heck with "The True North Strong and FREE", eh?  She doesn't like "strong and free"; she favours weak-kneed and obedient (like herself?); people who haven't the courage to trust their own intuition; to listen to their own body and their own conscience -- or to world history for that matter.

Whatever happened to "I am not partisan -- and no journalist worth reading will be"?
​J-Source.ca

Artha: Partisan --  1. a fervent and even militant proponent of something;  2. an ardent and enthusiastic supporter of some person or activity; zealot, drum beater, enthusiast ...

The "cowering" of which she speaks is not evident in the faces of anti-vaxxers; it takes courage to resist government, to risk arrest, to face condemnation of the sort that Riley provides.

"Cowering" describes her own personal response to a deliberate fear campaign. She's a "good girl"; she knows on which side her journalistic bread is buttered; she does what Big Daddy wants her to, and denigrates anyone who makes her feel uncomfortable about that. So there: pftttttttttt

It has been said of Riley that she has "difficulty defining her political world view" j-source -- but no longer, apparently. Now she has the Trudeau government to define it for her.

For another example of "cowering", Conservative MP Marilyn Gladu has decided it's in her own best political interest to say "uncle" -- GlobalNews:

• “Upon reflection, I recognize how dangerous it is to share misinformation about the severity of COVID-19 and the safety and efficacy of vaccines. I retract these comments in full.

Anybody with the ability to merely scratch the surface of the comments made in this regard by GlobalNews knows that the Covid statistics provided cover two full years -- two springs, two autumns (not one season as has always been done with the regular flu). Therefore, it seems that one should be able to divide by four to come closer to what has always occurred in every flu season (especially allowing for the dichotomy of "with Covid" and "from Covid").

It is a given that nobody -- absolutely nobody -- can refute that 99.4% percent of the world population survives "Covid".  Why? Because -- like "the flu" -- only already sick and/or frail people will die from it.

If anyone thinks that the current jab on offer does not mess with one's natural immunity, just look up the real stats on reactions to it.

It's no wonder the government -- and Susan Riley -- wants to believe we're all stupid. We're so stupid, apparently, that most people actually rely on TV and bought-and-paid-for media for information.  But when we do our own research we can't help seeing the obvious!

What's never mentioned in those media is that thousands of highly educated, long-experienced doctors and scientists around the world contradict TV news, paid-for-media, and bleeping governments!  Not to mention that Kary Mullis himself said you can't diagnose illness using his PCR test -- a bona fide fact that is all over the Internet!

The American Institute for Economic Research has this to say:

•  Adjusted for the population growth of over 200 million people and holding the death rates constant, the 1918 Flu would have killed over 2 million people if it occurred today, which is more than four times greater than Covid-19.

 
Susan Riley seems willfully ignorant; perhaps because she knows on which side her bread is buttered. She is doing whatever she feels is necessary to maintain her standing with the bought-off media. She is probably more to be pitied than censured, but I take it personally when she has the gall to call someone like me a coward. I've never backed down from any challenge in my life, and I'm not about to do it now.

Previously on YYC: A Flu By Any Other Name Part 1 and Part 2

See Also: Aier.org:

• ... the 1918 Flu would have killed over 2 million people if it occurred today, which is more than four times greater than Covid-19. 

I don't know why we have to keep saying this, but as long as there are Susan Rileys in the world, we will indeed have to keep saying it.

A good news reporter, a real sleuth, should ask questions (see image below), not rain insults down on a large percentage of the population. There are 10 year old girls and school boys who have a more logical and realistic handle on their own situation than Riley appears to.

She certainly wouldn't want to be asked the questions below: