SPEAK OF THE DEVIL

Image borrowed from here.

Clearly, if you mention a couple of devils, they will find a way to re-appear.

Please see my previous post.

First: Likud's MK Miki Zohar, so bedevilled by the criminal allegations against his hero Netanyahu, went so far as to brag that Jews are the most intelligent "race" and therefore know that Israel's leader is squeaky clean.

But Bibi's wife, maybe, not so much?

Wife of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu charged with fraud

• Netanyahu has denied any wrongdoing, dismissing the accusations against him and his wife as a media witch hunt.

Okay, let me get this straight: one of the things Bibi's charged with is media bribery, yet he accuses the media of slandering him. So, if they tried to do him in, then he couldn't possibly have paid them off. Is that his case?

That's certainly one way to approach it.  Another might be to think maybe he didn't pay them enough.

I wonder if he can be charged as an accessory to his wife's alleged thievery. Or don't those two share such intimacies?

And now Jordan Peterson -- Mr. Zohar's doppelganger -- whose best advice so far to young males is to clean up their rooms -- is busy trying to clean up somebody else's room and expecting to be paid big bucks for it.

From Global News:
Jordan Peterson sues Wilfrid Laurier for defamation following Lindsay Shepherd case

(Note: The below Global News paragraph contains a danger to your command of English! Please do not be misled by the incorrect spelling of the word "whose".  In one instance, "Peterson" also is spelled incorrectly, which could add considerably to the good professor's already extreme pique.  For your own protection, you might also read my Grammar articles.)

• Petersen – a psychology professor who’s contentious views have been protested across the country – and his lawyer, Howard Levitt of Levitt LLP, are suing the school and three faculty members  for defamation worth $1.5 million.

(Update Jun 22:  They've fixed the "who's", but not Peterson's name. It's nice to know the corporate media do have editors -- of a sort.)

The premise of Peterson's lawsuit appears to belie his earlier, loudly proclaimed belief in free speech - his own speech, that is.  When the shoe is on the other foot ...

From Now Toronto:

• Peterson has used defamatory, inflammatory and even violent terms to describe his academic opponents who take issue with his opposition to the use of gender pronouns, in particular, the federal government's adding of “gender identity and gender expression” to the list of prohibited grounds for discrimination in the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Now we know where the Devil lives.

Below Image borrowed from here.