Image: Mackay Cartoons
*** This post has a footer Addendum added March 7 ***
Sheila: How could you?
Did you think we had forgotten 1996?
GlobalNews: ‘Ministers gone rogue’: Ex-deputy PM chalks SNC-Lavalin affair up to Wilson-Raybould’s inexperience
Sheila, Sheila; did you think we had forgotten? Your own actions in 1996 as Deputy PM were characterized as volatile -- while Wilson-Raybould's are generally considered by many as measured, principled, and even stoical.
From the Canadian Encyclopedia):
But later on:
Indeed, volatility is high on Sheila's list of personal attributes:
This current smear is not the only instance of Sheila's having failed to give any benefit of any doubt to her fellow females. Despite Sheila's claim of having been raped and fondled by provincial government males (CBC), she unaccountably denied other women the benefit of any doubt by tweeting her support for the accused Jian Gomeshi.
Yet ... from Macleans:
But Sheila has apparently never moved off her stated viewpoint and we may get a clue as to why in the following comment from an unnamed politico:
From the same Canadian Encylopedia article cited above:
Sheila even cruelly made use of an anonymous rumour that Wilson-Raybould was not on speaking terms with her father at the time, intimating she might have been taking out on Trudeau some buried animosity toward her own father.
For one thing, Trudeau is hardly a father-figure; for another, this is far too bitchy and below the belt, even for a veteran politician who is accustomed to elbowing for first place.
Did Sheila take out on Chretien the fact that her own father had died and she was reduced to having to seek his advice from - what? - a seance?
From the above Canadian Encyclopedia article:
One can't help wondering if Jody Wilson-Raybould had said anything "tearfully" would Sheila have suggested that was a bid for sympathy? As it was, Wilson-Raybould came across as extremely self-possessed and honest.
Sheila should not have had to work hard to "sustain" her honesty. Either one is basically honest or one is not. And what Sheila has displayed does not appear to be honesty, but more like a vicious stab in the back, to what purpose one can only surmise.
There may well be a game being played here. Was Copps considering running again in the upcoming election? Is she now worried that Trudeau may be forced to resign as a direct result of the credibility attributed to Wilson-Raybould? Might Wilson-Raybould consider running for the leadership of the party? If so, might that be a reason for stressing a lack of experience and emotional maturity?
Sheila herself ran for leader back in 2004 and failed badly. Was she hoping for another crack at it?
Fact is, she reportedly had a hard time being allowed to run in her own riding, and kicked up quite a storm of accusations, even reportedly threatening to join the NDP if it became necessary.
Her apparent willingness to run under any banner open to her raises a further question: why is that she presents as Liberal, yet her journalistic career has consisted of writing for right-wing publications? For the first time, I'm wondering, who the heck is she really?
Post Political Career:
Sheila Copps sadly comes across as a ruthlessly ambitious, back-stabbing, any-port-in-a-storm opportunist. Not a pretty sight, and if she hadn't attacked the integrity of Wilson-Raybould and Jane Philpott, I might never have gotten the full picture of her personally.
She certainly has every right to switch from side to side as she wishes, even though that does suggest a lack of ideological consistency. But should it involve attempts to viciously undermine her contemporaries? One would have thought not.
*** Addendum March 7: ***
Re: Gerald Butts Mar 6 appearance on CPAC:
Jody Wilson-Raybould has testified that she was repeatedly warned that prosecuting SNC-Lavalin could result in losses of jobs.
The people warning her - The Prime Minister, his right hand guy Butts, and the top bureaucrat Wernick - all insist there was no attempt to influence her handling of the case.
Gerald Butts went before the Justice Committee yesterday and denied there was any pressure placed upon her, and he can't imagine why she would say there was. He thought he may have mentioned the jobs issue once, but certainly did not pressure her.
But during his testimony before the Committee I actually lost count of the number of times he slipped in the words "9000 lost jobs", but it was around 15 times. He was doing the same thing to the Committee that he denies was done to Wilson-Raybould.
Only one questioner asked, "Do we know for a fact that jobs would be lost?", but somehow the question never got answered.
Butts is a very smooth talker, knows how to present himself as exceedingly reasonable while circling almost every question put to him, insisting he's at a loss to understand what it was that upset Wilson-Raybould.
Macleans made it perfectly clear that it's unlikely jobs would disappear:
It seems far more likely that the jobs most feared to go down the tubes are the PM's and his partners in the current mayhem. His chances of winning Quebec in the upcoming election are reportedly not very good:
IPolitics: Why the Quebec election should have Justin Trudeau worried
* * * * * * * *
----> NEW Oct 24
Over 10,000 Scientists Sign Petition re: lockdowns "producing devastating effects".
Letter from Stephen Malthouse, MD
Denman Island, BC
To: Dr. Bonnie Henry,
BC Prov. Health Officer
Re: pandemic policies that do not appear based on high-quality scientific research
Netherlands ending Covid Measures, starting a lawsuit and telling us why! LINK
VIDEO: Rocco Galati: Your Rights to Decline Mandatory Covid Measures LINK
Lonely, muzzled and trapped: Nursing home residents describe lockdown measures LINK
Ontario, Canada Tracking LOWER on Covid Positives Than Lowest Projections -Media Hysterics Aside
See more here:
* * * * * * * *
Freedom's Just another Word for Lockdown
Better Daze on the Horizon - The Trudeau Boy's Fascist Covid Plan for 2021?
Confront the Lies: It's not really about the "novel" virus.
Covid Horse Race: Moderna Takes an Early Lead
But The Sky Just Keeps On Falling ...
Photo by Brian O'Connor, North Bay
QUOTE of the MONTH:
We believe in government with the consent of the governed.
-- Jesse Jackson 1988
-----> Follow the trial(s) of Julian Assange LINK
See also: John Pilger: The Stalinist Trial of Julian Assange ... is not due process. It is due revenge LINK
Video - Pilger: We have the right to know LINK
Constitutional Rights Centre Inc. (CRC) MEDIA LINK
Lawyer Rocco Galati on Twitter. LINK
Ontario Civil Liberties Assoc.- OCLA LINK
Mann’s hockey stick ironically proves Sun (not CO2) drives climate
Dr. Roger Higgs LINK
EXPOSING THE HOAX
The COVID-19(84) Red Pill
LEADING CAUSES OF DEATHS IN CANADA
WorldAtlas - LINK
The WHO: TEN ACTIONS TOWARDS VACCINATION FOR ALL (PDF) LINK
ChychoLive: Current Events; Covid-19 Theories and Aftermath LINK
JUSTICE FOR MOHAMED HARKAT:
Stop Moe Harkat’s deportation to torture LINK
Will We Allow Canada To Deport Mohamed Harkat To Torture? ... HuffPost
The True North Not So Free ... YYC:
Moe needs help with his legal costs. Visit here to donate online.
Call for Reform of Canada’s Extradition Act Hassan Diab Website
*-------> Israeli protesters keep pressure on Netanyahu
- Protests, now in their 11th week LINK
’42 Knees in One Day’: Israeli Snipers Open Up About Shooting Gaza Protesters
Israel’s War Criminals in Their Own Words
Miko Peled: The State of Israel Will Crumble ...
Does Israel "own"
America; Netanyahu thinks so. video
Israel Palestine Conflict 101
ACTIVIST TEACHER -
... also on Facebook
Arch. & Eng. for 9/11 Truth
Canada Palestine Assoc.
CDNs for Justice & Peace in the Middle East
Count Me Out (of census)
Defend Democracy Press
Famous Canadian Women
Friends of Science
Gray Zone Project
Greencrow As The Crow Flies
IF NOT NOW
In Gaza, Eva Bartlett
Information Clearing House
Israel Palestine News
Jewish Voice for Peace
Justice for Mohamed Harkat
Justice for Hassan Diab
LGBTQ+ Online Safety
Palestine Photo Project
Real Climate Science
Truth and Shadows
Vaccination Info Network
Vaccine Choice Canada
Watts Up With That?