ONTARI-ARI-SCARY-OH! -- Part Two

19/4/2021

Alamy: WESTMINSTER, LONDON/ENGLAND- 29 August 2020: Protesters at an anti-lockdown Unite for Freedom Rally, against coronavirus restrictions

ONTARI-ARI-SCARY-OH! -- Part Two

Welcome to Planet Earth where every day is Hallowe'en.

(See also: Part One)

A Voice from the Grave:

"They have an agenda." Kary Mullis, Nobel Laureate - PCR inventor. Newswars

NatNewsWatch: Ontario walks back new pandemic police powers following widespread backlash

Civil libertarians and pundits attacked new anti-pandemic restrictions announced Friday by Ford as misguided, saying the added police powers aimed at enforcing stay-at-home orders were overkill.
The pandemic, meanwhile, continued unabated on Saturday. The number of patients in hospital due to the novel coronavirus rose above 2,000 for the first time since the beginning of the pandemic, with 726 in intensive care and 501 needing a ventilator, authorities reported.

"Since the beginning of the pandemic". Very interesting wording. NOT for the first time -- but the first time SINCE the beginning of what they call the "pandemic". In other words, it's not the first time the numbers have risen above 2000!

So ... There is no more need to increase restrictions than there was at the beginning, when, suddenly, it was no longer called "influenza', and people were encouraged not to wear masks! (Until, of course, masks turned into a massive get-rich operation.)

Again: DO THE MATH

Population of Ontario in 2021: 14,733,119 -- No. of Hospitals in Ontario: 384

2000 hospitalized. 2000 ./. 384 = 5.2 -- ergo: hospitals NOT "overwhelmed".

It's not as if we haven't been informed, informed and informed by actual experts rather than government so-called spokespeople who are lying through their cowardly teeth!

FreedomArticles: Busted: 11 COVID Assumptions Based on Fear not Fact - July 2020

So many people are walking around with their head full of unfounded COVID assumptions.
THE IMPLICATIONS: Flaw after flaw, assumption after assumption, official COVID testing and the official COVID narrative are just a house of cards.

To all the faceless zombies out there: Does a 99.8% survival rate mean nothing to you? There are far, far more people dying of various other things, including as a result of lockdowns! How come you never worried when people died of the flu? Because nobody told you to worry!

When I was a kid, kids got all the going infections (not me, for some reason, but a lot of kids I knew) and survived with improved immunity. Now they induce fear in mothers so that the drug pushers can make obscene profits. God help the child who has a fearful mother!

Want to Figure out your chances of dying of "Covid"? I'm a female in the 80+ bracket with mild hypertension. Turns out I have a 100% chance of survival. But, with a vaccine -- because I also have two auto-immune conditions -- I could die. No way I'm getting the vaccine! I want to die when I die, or when I decide to die; I don't want to be killed.

Read the Freedom article. There are 9 serious flaws listed.

READ THE WHOLE THING. And stop watching TV talking heads and reading the govt-paid-for "mainstream" news! You are being lied to big-time -- because that's what politicians and their minions do best.

"... for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test.”
When used to determine the cause of a disease, the PCR test has many flaws

Read it:. There are 9 serious flaws listed.

CASES are not sick people; "cases" are people who tested positive with a flawed test that its own maker (who is probably not resting in peace) said could not diagnose any illness.

It's even been tossed out in a court of law!

RT: Landmark legal ruling finds that Covid tests are not fit for purpose. So what do the MSM do? They ignore it

Four German holidaymakers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one was judged to be positive for Covid-19 have won their case, in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable.

NewsWars: The Nobel Laureate inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, died at the age of 74 back in August of 2019 but prior to his death, he had a lot of interaction with Fauci.

"They have an agenda", said Mullis.

See Fauci get hot under the collar when asked why he doesn't get tested. VIDEO

Is it still "conspiracy theory" when a Nobel Laureate says it?

2 Comments

Penny link

19/4/2021 05:43:56 pm

hey yaya that sentence is weird

"The number of patients in hospital due to the novel coronavirus rose above 2,000 for the first time since the beginning of the pandemic, with 726 in intensive care and 501 needing a ventilator, authorities reported."

I mean, so many ways to read this?

The numbers hit more then 2000 (above) since the pandemic began?

Or there are some 2000 people in Ontario hospitals some of them have tested positive while they were hospitalized for other care/treatment?

I always find the ventilator numbers off because it was my understanding the ventilators were not in use as much anymore for Covid, more harm then good. So are these people hospitalized for something else that required ventilation?

You can go back a year and see article after article saying this is not the panacea and the outcome is worse, so I always find that number really suspect.

https://www.statnews.com/2020/04/21/coronavirus-analysis-recommends-less-reliance-on-ventilators/

https://time.com/5820556/ventilators-covid-19/

https://www.ctvnews.ca/world/nearly-all-covid-19-patients-put-on-ventilators-in-new-york-s-largest-health-system-died-study-finds-1.4908161?cache=%3FclipId%3D89578%3FautoPlay%3Dtrue%3Fot%3DAjaxLayout

"The symptoms of infection were far from clear-cut. About a third of all patients showed up with fevers, 17 per cent were breathing too fast and just under 30 per cent needed extra oxygen. On average, patients were sent home after four days."

Pretty clear the ventilators were upping the death count for those with covid who weren't really ill

Is it possible ventilators are being used for something else? I just have soo much trouble with the way that stat is bandied about!

yaya

19/4/2021 06:57:54 pm

I would respect any conclusions you might come to, Penny. But I think they're making sure that there's nothing to work with.

I simply took the figure of 2000 at face value and pointed out that, even if it were true, this season or last, it was not capable of "overwhelming" Ontario's hospitals.

And, of course, we both know what "cases" means.

You're not meant to be able to sort it out. The idea is merely to strongly suggest that things are bad without having to be too specific.

Besides, it was the "modelling" that they said motivated Ford to clamp down, and modelling is iffy at best.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=doug+ford+covid+modelling+&atb=v1-1&ia=web

I think it was made clear last season that ventilators were a huge mistake, and "some" people were killed by the use of them, but it's not at all clear whether or not they're being used now, or in what circumstances. If they want to bump people off, and say they died of Covid, ventilators would be the route to take, and if family is not allowed near the patient, they wouldn't know, would they.

They mostly just want to scare people into taking the jab, and if you find it hard to sort out their lingo, it's probably impossible for a lot of other people. They'll just feel in the dark and scared, and will see the vaccine as a way out of the whole mess.

But it won't be. Because it will start all over again next year with a "new strain" and a new vaccine. It's evil; pure evil.

ONTARI-ARI-SCARY-OH! -- Part Two

Leave a Reply.