Mueller's Message: Don't Think; Just Believe

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (R) talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin during the arrival ceremony for the Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Summit in Vladivostok, Russia, September 8, 2012.


Hillary Clinton campaign did same thing Trump campaign [allegedly] did, but nobody is talking about it

Bizpacreview: Mainstream media ignored Hillary Clinton’s self-dealings with Russia while playing up the Trump-Russia hoax

It seems the Clinton bunch were colluding all over the place: China, Ukraine, whatever. (Hey, what if the "Russians" turn out to be Ukrainians? Hmmmmmmm.)

Now, on the subject of two-faced famous folk:

WashTimes: Michael Moore marched in New York anti-Trump rally allegedly organized by Russians

Check out the photo: he's surrounded by filthy Russians.

Is Michael Moore just naive; if so should we pay attention to him at all?  Personally, I lost interest in his wisdom when, in his film Fahrenheit 9/11 [YouTube], he blamed the Saudis for the attacks on the Twin Towers. Just the Saudis; nobody else. No Israelis, no US gov't or US military.

It was up to more inquiring minds to talk about the "dancing Israelis" -- see Corbett Report. 

Was he aiding and abetting the Bush Administration back then, even though he does try to come across as a flaming Dem?  It sure made him famous.

Here's something even stranger:  Prior to the 2016 election, Moore dissed Trump [YouTube] in an obliquely complimentary way -- from a written script, which seems odd for such an inveterate talker.

Then he launched a film just a few weeks prior to the election -- "Michael Moore in TrumpLand" -- which presumably supported Clinton and contained his real thoughts about Trump, but you had to buy it to see it, so how much help could it have been to the Dems?

Too little; too deliberately late?  Like Mueller, can Moore be given credit for appearing to at least try?

WashTimes: Everybody's Playing the New Game in Town

• The indictments will never lead to a trial; they were not intended to do that. The bad guys are safely at home in Moscow, never to be seen again in the United States. But the indictments were a necessary career move for Mr. Mueller. [...]
• Indicting evildoers in absentia is a prosecutor’s good fortune. Since no one will ever come to trial, Mr. Mueller will never have to present a case to be judged whether weak, strong or otherwise.

Canada has also been playing the game. Here's an article questioning Canada's falling into line with US anti-Russian sentiment, and whether it has a moral leg to stand on in doing so:

StrategicCulture.org: Canada to Deliver Severe Blow to Relations with Russia

• The government faces important human rights challenges, including violence against indigenous women and girls, the rights of indigenous peoples, the impact of Canada’s extractive and garment industries abroad, and children in detention.
• Canada has been condemned by the United Nations for human rights violations. In 2015, the UN human rights committee report examined Canada’s compliance with the International Covenant on Political and Civil Rights. It expressed deep concerns about Canada’s anti-terrorism bill, C-51, saying that it doesn’t have enough safeguards to protect civil liberties, and could lead to “mass surveillance and targeting activities’’ by the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS).

It's even harder to understand the vitriolic blind spot of a respected Canadian journalist, Paul Koring -- or do western journalists achieve high regard simply by firmly upholding US/Canada political myths? (Not to mention that Obama won a Nobel Prize simply for saying he would end the Iraq war.)

IPolitics / Koring: The Kremlin’s objective? Anyone but Hillary

• ... even if no Russian ever sits in the dock in a U.S. courtroom or winds up in an American prison, the brazen operation is being exposed.

Koring reveals a passionate hatred of Trump, a decided bias against Putin, and even brushes aside his own comment that Clinton was "a terrible campaigner".  He's avidly pushing for impeachment, as shown in his final paragraph where the main thrust of most media articles generally resides: -

• ... those who genuinely believed Trump was the better candidate, may question his legitimacy if it become clear that Putin’s interference picked their president.

Koring is doing what he says the Russians did.  He's attempting to foment distrust of Trump and Putin.  Wow! At this rate he might become the next Governor General of Canada!

See also on YYC: American Pots and Russian Kettles