Lock-down Perps so Dumb They Think We're Stupid

Image borrowed from here.


Lock-down Perps So Dumb ...

They Think We're Stupid

Some folks are certainly not thinking clearly but, clearly, not all folks have caved, as increasingly being demonstrated in the streets and parks. (Note: Parliament Hill has erected even more fencing now to prevent protests on its doorstep.)

​CTV: Huge Protests Across US Raise Fears of New Virus Outbreaks

It's the media that are raising the fears, not the protests!  These people have more important things on their minds - such as being treated like human beings for a change.

In Canada, people are crowding into the streets of Toronto to protest against a far greater threat to their overall well-being than Covid19:

CTV: Thousands Rally in Toronto Against Anti-Black Racism ...

A girl died from something much more insidious than a flu virus.

Whose fear is being raised by these protests?  Certainly not the folks who got out in the fresh air (where Covid doesn't do so well) venting their frustration. That's called "getting it out of your system", a very healthy practice.  No, it's the "authorities" becoming fearful, as they should be, except that when they get scared they hurt the people even more.

Now look what's been dumped on the already burdened:

CTV: New study suggests wearing a face mask at home could help limit spread of COVID-19

It appears CTV is trying very hard, but failing to truly earn its government handout.

The key word above is "could". Congrats, CTV, on increasing media dubiousness while attempting to enhance efforts to push the population one more step toward the desired level of insanity.

But never mind, I'm sure they are readying "homes" for mental coviditis victims as well.

For months, these folks have been isolated with family, and now they want them to start worrying about infecting one another?  It's too bizarre for mere words.

• Data was collected in three stages using a questionnaire that asked participants to share details about their living arrangements and self-report their practices around mask-wearing and physical distancing activities at home. The majority of participants ranged in age from 18 to 59, and about a quarter of them reported being over the age of 60. There were 13 children reported as secondary cases, with an average age of three years old.

Yeah, I bet data was collected, very personal data. And more of it is gleefully anticipated!  You can't control an entire population unless you know who and where they are and what they're doing at all times.

• Results of the study, published in the BMJ Global Journal on Thursday, concluded that wearing a face mask inside the home was 79 per cent effective in preventing transmission of COVID-19 between an infected person and other family members, but only before symptoms of the virus were present. It also found that the use of a face mask after symptoms of the coronavirus were present did little to provide additional protection.
• The study also found that daily disinfection habits in the household using chlorine or ethanol-based products also helped to curb transmission rates by 77 per cent.

So what would that be -- six of one, half a dozen of the other?  And of course, we have to believe that everybody in this voluntary disclosure told the absolute truth.

It was published by "BMJ" so it must be factual, right?  Nevermind that "BMJ" might well publish just about anything if enough money landed in its cash drawer.

Why do you suppose that literally all of the info provided here is couched in such indefinite language as to render it useless for any truly practical purpose?

"(Cynthia) Carr * believes..."

"Could help ..."

Does Ms. Carr even consider that the actual percentage of Covid deaths in the world population is, out of all humanity, a mere 0.005%? (Scroll down through the Indie article to see the chart.) Why is she even wasting her time on this? It could only be for money.

See, that's what rots Bill Gates' brightly coloured sox. Humanity. Too much of it. Too few of them dying.

The "homes" in which people are catching their deaths do not have mommies and daddies and kiddies. They have grampas and grammas dying in circumstances of (reportedly deliberate) neglect. See PennyforyourThoughts for detailed info.

And you might also take a close look at The Independent article (referred to above with regard  the world percentage of Covid19 deaths) in that it tends to contradict the BMJ study:

• Vulnerable people who have been shielded at home due to higher risk of coronavirus may not have been in such danger as originally thought, an expert adviser to the government has said.
• Professor Peter Openshaw, who sits on the government’s New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group, said the guidance could be “fine tuned” for people with conditions such as asthma and some cancer patients, who are “not as vulnerable as we thought”.

Damn! Covid's not working as hoped. How are we going to get them to take the god-knows-what's-in-it vaccine so we can rake in a massive return on our investment?  We're not doing this for the good of our health, you know. We're in it for the moola.  Haha, we've got lots of it already, and you don't, but we figured that if we could trick you into relying on "leadership" instead of your own noses, we could literally make a much bigger killing.

Not enough people are dying!  Maybe if we get them all relying on masks, we can at least induce a few lung infections.

One might think that with her reportedly vast experience, Ms. Carr would be focusing on the much worse scourge of cancer instead. But dupes wouldn't respond very well to dumb suggestions like wearing a 24-hour mask against cancer. She might be able to make a case for copper bracelets ... or is that for arthritis?

Well, Ms.Carr is not the only purveyor of intangibles like "may" and "could". There are plenty out there using those very same words in order to contradict her:

MedicalNet: Wearing masks may increase your risk of coronavirus infection, expert says

Maybe the writer of that one hopes to scare people out of wearing masks in order increase their chances of infection?  Good luck with that also.

The only thing we plebes can be sure of from the above is that a ton of personal information is being collected and recorded under the guise of "protection".

You know what? If I were still part of a family unit, it would be no time at all before we'd all be saying, "To heck with this; I'd rather get Covid than look and feel like a brainwashed dork."

And I bet we wouldn't get it.

I'm heading toward 80, and have not worn a mask from the outset. I go outside every other day or so to get a good walk, and shop, and watch all sorts of human behaviour. I've never had a vaccine and I've never had the flu, and I don't intend to start now.

So I'm looking forward to being charged with some sort of misdemeanour, or maybe even just for my demeanour.

Trust me. Covid19 is not a serious virus!  You've got to be compromised in some way, or at death's door already -- with everybody secretly hoping you'll get it over-with -- before Covid has any chance of doing a real number on you.

But God bless CTV, I can hear our vaccine-investing "leaders" murmuring: hey, that $600 million we gave to the media was a good investment in working hard to keep the population addled, nervous and utterly dependent on help and instructions from their superiors for every last piddling aspect of their puny lives.

But fortunately, not everyone is so easily bamboozled. Maybe the nosy family detectives should focus on the outcome of the protests that are slowly but surely burgeoning everywhere.

If I had a lawn, I'd put out a big sign that said, "How stupid do you think we are?"

*Cynthia Carr is a psychologist who calls herself an epidemiologist and is sole proprietor of a business called EPI Research Inc. which claims to "help clients access quality data to support evidence-based decision making and return on strategic investment."

Below Image from: Senior Living Foresight -- How Greed Made the Whole Senior Living Industry Go Crazy