Life with climate change and vaccines

Image from Global Research: Why America’s Mandated Over-vaccination Schedules are Unsafe and of Questionable Usefulness.


​Life with Climate Change

... and vaccines

There's never been any kind of life where climate hasn't always changed, century after century, eon after eon. The fear of "climate change", and the myth that it can be controlled, is increasingly emphasized to push populations further toward total dependence on the whims of governments blackmailed by corporate "experts".

Seriously, folks -- as tin foil hat as this may seem -- they won't stop talking about it and everything will be blamed on it and freedoms will gradually be lost because of it.

Gradually, like oblivious frogs in a slowly heating pot of water, democracy will die and the very word will fade from memory!

Currently, the Greta theme of "look what you've done to my life" has clearly not yet taken a firm enough hold and will need to be emphasized at every opportunity. The same thing goes for the vax mania. The perceived need to vaccinate and medicate for every little sniffle and sneeze is increasing, due to outright scare tactics, and will continue to increase as more and more pharmaceuticals are created and marketed.

In a world where it is dangerous to even question vaccines can we honestly believe we live in a democratic society?

Sonorannews: Why vaccine manufacturers are exempt from liability

• ... to stabilize a vaccine market

The market is everything to those who would achieve power!  You don't matter; your children don't matter. The market rules!

Has nobody wondered why Greta herself is said to be one of the scarily increasing numbers of children diagnosed as being on the autism spectrum?  No matter; eventually, it will be that virtually every problem corporate rule creates can be conveniently blamed on "climate change"; in other words, God or some kind of freaky image of Mother Nature.

Yes, "corporate rule".  Anybody who thinks democracy is not systematically being eroded in favour of corporatocracy, needs seriously to think again. Fascism is merely another term for it.

Did our boys die in WWII to save us from Fascism?  No, they died so that our leaders would have dibs on it.  And "climate change" is just one of the ways to justify it and keep it propped up.

From Wikipedia:

• Corporatist ideas have been expressed since Ancient Greek and Roman societies, with integration into Catholic social teaching and Christian democracy political parties. They have been paired by various advocates and implemented in various societies with a wide variety of political systems, including authoritarianism, absolutism, fascism, liberalism and socialism.

Call it democracy all you want, but when vaccines are mandated and loving, intelligent parents lose decision-making powers for their own offspring while corporations are made exempt from prosecution for vaccine injuries, that's a huge and telling example of creeping fascism based on rule by corporations.

NatNewswatch: Today’s babies won’t know life without climate change, new report warns

• A baby born in Canada today will never know a time in which his or her health isn't at risk from a warming planet, an annual look at climate change and human health ...
• The Lancet medical journal's 2019 countdown on health and climate change has dire warnings about the kind of world we might be leaving to future generations.
• "The life of every child born today will be profoundly affected by climate change," the report says. "Without accelerated intervention, this new era will come to define the health of people at every stage of their lives."

Seems a bit of a gaffe to have used the term "global warming" when it isn't even winter yet and there is enough snow on the ground outside my window that children have built a large snow fort. But the news outlet that's helping to spread the angst is quoting the Lancet, and as far as I'm concerned, that's just another indication of what the Lancet truly has become, and why it was deemed necessary to destroy the career of Dr. Andrew Wakefield:

BBC: MMR researchers issue retraction

Some of Wakefield's colleagues issued retractions in order to save their careers, but several did not, including Wakefield himself, and he of course has been deprived of his licence to practise.

The point being overlooked is that only the article itself was retracted; the opinions were not. Dr. Wakefield and his colleagues had simply reported bowel and cognitive problems in some kids who had recently been innoculated with the MMR vaccine and that resulted in a vicious personal attack on him to the point where he ultimately was deprived of his licence to practise.

One had to surmise there was an agenda behind all of this, and the Lancet's dire warning about "climate change" reveals its true motives in bringing down Wakefield, despite that he had no problem agreeing that his team had not proved a connection with the MMR, but had simply suggested that further study was needed in order to determine what so far seemed a strange coincidence.

This was not at all what some sectors wanted to hear, especially in view of the BBC reporting that there was "widespread public concern, and a drop in vaccination rates", and we all know, or should know, that investors will do whatever they feel is necessary to forestall a drop in the value of their stock.

EpicMag: It cannot be denied that vaccines [and "climate change"] are big business ...

As are the news media. It's no secret that the leader of the attack on Wakefield was media mogul Rupert Murdoch and guess where lay his extra-curricular interests:

From Whale:

• Brian Deer is the reporter who savaged Dr Wakefield from the pages of the Sunday Times, a paper managed by Rupert Murdoch's son James Murdoch who is on the board of GlaxoSmithKline which makes the MMR.  Deer researched his case with the help of Medico-Legal Investigations a private enquiry company whose only source of funding is the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. 

As further indication of Murdoch sleaze:

• In July 2011, Murdoch faced allegations that his companies, including the News of the World, owned by News Corporation, had been regularly hacking the phones of celebrities, royalty, and public citizens. Murdoch faced police and government investigations into bribery and corruption by the British government and FBI investigations in the U.S. Wikipedia

See also Frontline's video regarding the allegations against Murdoch and his general character.

One should also take the time to review the following:

DuluthReader: Proof That Big Vaccine (Merck, Glaxo, et al) and the CDC Can’t be Trusted When it Comes to Vaccines

Movie: Hear the Silence 2003

Vaxxed: From Coverup to Controversy
YouTube wants you to pay them for the privilege of watching this movie (a great way to keep the number of viewers down).  But you can read the accompanying description if you like.

Vaxxed on IMDB:
Sadly, Vaxxed gets a very low rating on IMDB. The thing about IMDB is that ratings normally reflect quality and interest, not veracity, since Hollywood produces a lot of fictionalized accounts of world happenings, yet in the case of Vaxxed, a review that denounces it outright as a pack of lies and the movie therefore a piece of trash is placed up front, allowing it to considerably deflate the movie's overall rating.

So one also has to wonder where IMDB derives its sources of funding.

Despite such vicious attempts to control information regarding vaccines, however:

HealthImpactNews: Resistance to Vaccine Medical Tyranny Growing in the U.S. as VAXXED Film Gains Wider Audience

There's also a popular YouTube Video: Interview of Del Bigtree, producer of VAXXED -- to which a Commenter responded as follows:

• Donna Taylor 2 years ago
• Why am I not hearing any of this information in CANADA?  My daughter's Infantile Spasms started right after her 3 mo. vaccine & later developed LGS & that was back in 1970 - she is now 46 & her whole life has been one drug after another trying to control these seizures.  Between 3 mo & 6 mo. she regressed back to infancy.  She is non verbal & mentally like a 2  yr. old.  I have learned so much about these vaccines & the poisons that are in them but all this info. is coming from USA.  WHY IN CANADA aren't we hearing about this.  Young mothers don't want to hear vaccines are bad & won't investigate - scares me for my grandchildren & 4 great grandkids.  Are the vaccines the same harmful ones as in USA?????

You betcha they are.  Canada has advance market commitments to purchase vaccines, which means that, even in years when the purported effectiveness of the flu vaccine is rated as poor, they are still purchased with tax dollars and made available to Canadians: See Section 3.5.1 Vaccine Supply on this Government of Canada page that outlines "the many steps involved in the process of making pandemic vaccine available and monitoring its use". 

• In 2011, Canada entered a new 10-year contract with GlaxoSmithKline Inc. (GSK) to ensure that there is rapid and priority access to a sufficient supply of adjuvanted pandemic vaccine produced (i.e. manufactured, filled and finished) in Canada. Canada's pandemic vaccine strategy also includes contracting for a back-up supply of pandemic vaccine.

For those who aren't afraid of differing opinions, here's the latest video (Sept. 2019) regarding the Wakefield saga: YouTube: The Pathological Optimist

​Related on YYC