Is Trudeau setting himself up for a fall?

Image from BlazingCatfur


Is Trudeau setting himself up for a fall?
​
Why in the world would Justin choose "Pizzagate" as a point on which to attack political opponent Scheer?

​GlobalNews: Trudeau slams Scheer over response to town hall question about ‘Pizzagate’ conspiracy

• “The Clinton Foundation is part of child trafficking and child sacrifice if you study it. It is in the Pizzagate,” the town hall attendee said to applause from the crowd. “How do we get that money back?”

The man was referring to the fact that our current PM made, on behalf of Canadians, a huge donation to the questionable Clinton Foundation.

It's interesting how the media keep repeating as absolute fact -- almost nervously, as if trying to make certain that everybody hears and believes it -- that the story called "Pizzagate" has been "debunked" and therefore written off as a "conspiracy theory".

It's a cynically cagey way of preventing discussion.

This happened to me in 2001, at dinner with friends, when I questioned an aspect of what is now called "9/11". I had wondered aloud how it was that the three buildings came down in their own footprints like controlled demolition. My host, a former catholic priest and then professor at an Ottawa university immediately said, "Oh, so you're one of those conspiracy theorists".

Which, as mentioned above, is a gagging term that caught on surprisingly quickly in "polite" society, even among highly-educated people one might legitimately expect to possess open, inquiring minds. Sadly, what it shouts is: "End of discussion".

It strikes me as the equivalent of putting one's fingers in one's ears and sing-songing, "I can't hear you; I can't hear you."

Clearly, Scheer's subconscious knows that "Pizzagate" is in the same category as "9/11" -- that is, so absolutely verboten that he couldn't even hear the word being spoken.

His temporary hearing loss didn't protect him, however, from Trudeau's apparently dire need to defend the donation to the Clinton Foundation, forgetting, apparently, that he is not entirely devoid of close contacts with convicted paedophiles.

Which really is sad because, once again, Trudeau was defending his own actions by putting down someone else -- as in the case of SNC-Lavalin and former Attorney-General Jody Wilson-Raybould -- without realizing - again -  how that could backfire.

(Where in the world was his brain at? Is his pal, Gerald Butts, not available by phone?)

Especially in light of this:

VancouverSun: Former Vancouver private school teacher sentenced for child porn

• Ingvaldson had previously taught at another Vancouver private school, West Point Grey Academy, with ... Justin Trudeau.

and, more succinctly, this:

IntFreepress: Justin Trudeau’s Best Friend Jailed After International Pedophile Ring Bust

• Justin Trudeau and Ingvaldson have been closely linked since their days as room-mates at college,

And then this:

Globe&Mail: Order of Canada recipient Peter Dalglish accused of abusing children he pledged to help

• He briefly worked in the Prime Minister’s Office under Pierre Trudeau before taking work as a lawyer.

Question: If Dalglish only "briefly worked" in Pierre Trudeau's office, what was he doing, all these years later, so palsy-walsy with Justin?

We could look at Justin's "Pizzagate" problem like this: he's obviously been pretty thick with the Clintons, so if they were involved in child molestation, and he knew about it, he most likely would deny it.

VigileQuebec: 191 things we learned from wikileaks Podesta emails.

Anyway, what does "debunked" really mean?  It certainly doesn't mean that a theory has been disproved; it simply means that the theory has not been proven beyond doubt.

To "debunk" is not to disprove, though if suggested so with sufficient authority and backed up by the usual suspects in the corporate media, it becomes possible for ambitious, status-quo entities to treat it as a lie.

All that the so-called "conspiracy theorists" want is to freely express their doubts and ask for a proper investigation.  All the "debunkers' want is to cut off discussion and prevent investigation.

Sadly and wisely said by someone in a position to know is that "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely." John Dalbert Acton

Lord Action knew what was going on, and has been going on, for as long as there have been Popes and Rulers:

• Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority: still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority.

Debauchery, thievery, murder and mayhem have been a feature of high places since the dawn of humankind. If the most powerful people in the world have thought since forever that it's okay to exploit what they view as their underlings, why do they so often feel the need to justify their crimes with high-sounding ideals (as currently in the case of bringing "democracy" to Venezuela)?

Probably because, at some level, they know it's not okay, and that they, themselves, have supported the laws against it.

Oddly, in the 60 Minutes video linked to below, there's a man who insists that "consensual" sex with children is okay, and accuses the interviewer of not being rational.

Videos on YouTube:
60 Minutes on the UK Gov. Pedophile Ring Network (Link)
Conspiracy of Silence (Banned Discovery Channel Documentary) (Link)

Below:
CBS News Ben Swann Investigates Pizzagate